Barcelona · La Liga · Champions League 25/26 — pick a competition below (same club, separate player pools)
Competition
LaLiga 25/26
Barcelona
Default view is a per-slot first-choice selection in the season’s most-used formation. Swaps recompute personnel and Synergy — style metrics stay on season aggregates.
Interactive pitch
Hover a player for details. Use Side bias or Squad profiles to read the XI. Select bench → slot to swap.
Bench
Team Synergy
Team strength and Synergy (synergy-v3) for this XI. Both update on pitch swaps.
Team strength
90.1
Mean primary-role quality of this XI
Synergy
95.1
Capability identity 91.4 · complete 98.2
Identity
Possession
Confidence 87%
Strongest capability
100.0
Deep Progression
Biggest gap
9.4
Tempo Control · score 9.8 / target 78
This squad is exceptionally suited to possession football because it combines Elite wide playmaking, Elite recovery pace, Elite width. Main limitations: Below-minimum tempo control; Limited ball retention; Limited rotational flexibility.
Personnel (live)
Recomputed from current XI selection — role tiers are fixed inputs, not re-derived.
Progression hub
Pedri
Elite Carrier
Primary creator
Lamine Yamal
Elite Playmaking Winger
Primary threat
Robert Lewandowski
Elite Poacher
Side bias (current XI)
+1.5%
RHS lean
No structural gaps in current XI.
Style (season — fixed)
LaLiga 25/26 · Season aggregates vs the rest of this competition. Click a shot zone to light it on the pitch.
Team identity
League-percentile style fingerprint for Barcelona — shape of play, not overall strength. Outer edge = top of the competition on that axis.
Possession
Ball possession vs league
P100
1/20
Assisted creation
Share of shots after a teammate pass/cross
P95
2/20
Set pieces
Shots from corners / FKs / throw-in SP
P11
18/20
Transitions
Fast-break shot share
P11
18/20
Directness
Accurate long balls / passes
P0
20/20
Box threat
In-box shot share (six-yard + box)
P58
9/20
Press proxy
Defensive actions per opp possession
P100
1/20
Dashed ring = league median (P50)
Attack shape
Attack →
Shots from the six-yard + penalty box (close-range volume).
Mean xG / shot
Set-piece goals 15.8% of goals
0.127
3 of 20 · P89 · league med 0.109
How chances are created
Share of season shots by situation — not a quality score.
Assisted shot %
% of shots after a teammate pass/cross
58.9%
2 of 20 · P95 · league med 50
Set-piece shot %
Corners, FKs, throw-in SP, set pieces
22.4%
18 of 20 · P11 · league med 27.5
Fast-break shot %
Share of shots from transitions
5.3%
18 of 20 · P11 · league med 6.8
On the ball
Possession
Avg ball possession
66.7%
1 of 20 · P100 · league med 50.2
Long-ball rate
Accurate long balls / passes
3.1%
20 of 20 · P0 · league med 5.7
Final-third entries
Final-third entries / passes
9.9%
20 of 20 · P0 · league med 12.2
Side bias
Distance-weighted heatmap lean (+RHS / −LHS)
+6.0
7 of 20 · P68 · league med 3.4
Without the ball
Defensive actions / opp poss
Recoveries + tackles + ints ÷ opp possession
222.5
medium confidence — proxy, not PPDA
1 of 20 · P100 · league med 143.8
Clearances / match
Team clearances per game
18.3
2 of 20 · P95 · league med 24.9
Opp touches in box
Opponent penalty-area touches / match
17.9
2 of 20 · P95 · league med 23.1
Duel win %
Won/match · aerial 10.5 · ground 37.7
52.7%
2 of 20 · P95 · league med 49.9
Game State
Historical next-goal tendency · lead protection · chasing response — same engine as Match Preview
38 matches · 100% coverage
Level
HIGH54 entries · 1443 min in state
Goal timing
When goals arrive across the match clock · scored % · conceded % · net per window
38 of 38 matches
Scored %
17%
0-15
12%
16-30
18%
31-45
14%
46-60
19%
61-75
21%
76-90+
Conceded %
14%
0-15
11%
16-30
31%
31-45
6%
46-60
17%
61-75
22%
76-90+
Net / match (window only)
+0.29
0-15
+0.18
16-30
+0.16
31-45
+0.29
46-60
+0.32
61-75
+0.32
76-90+
95 scored · 36 conceded · stoppage (90+) in 76–90+
Cross-layer insights (interpretive)
Anchored to season side bias — not updated by pitch swaps.
Team side bias near central (+6.0); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
No wide player assigned on this flank.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Similar teams
Style shape vs top-5 leagues, 25/26 — cosine similarity of the Team Identity radar percentiles (Possession, Assisted creation, Set pieces, Transitions, Directness, Box threat, Press proxy). Formation is context only and does not affect the score.
Napoli
Serie A
Closest axes
Closest on Directness (P0 vs P0), Transitions (P11 vs P11), Box threat (P58 vs P63).
Manchester City
PL 25/26
Closest axes
Closest on Directness (P0 vs P0), Possession (P100 vs P100), Press proxy (P100 vs P100).
Paris Saint-Germain
Ligue 1
Closest axes
Closest on Possession (P100 vs P100), Press proxy (P100 vs P100), Set pieces (P11 vs P10).