Napoli · Serie A · Champions League 25/26 — pick a competition below (same club, separate player pools)
Competition
Serie A 25/26
Napoli
Default view is a per-slot first-choice selection in the season’s most-used formation. Swaps recompute personnel and Synergy — style metrics stay on season aggregates.
Interactive pitch
Hover a player for details. Use Side bias or Squad profiles to read the XI. Select bench → slot to swap.
Bench
Team Synergy
Team strength and Synergy (synergy-v3) for this XI. Both update on pitch swaps.
Team strength
89.5
Mean primary-role quality of this XI
Synergy
84.7
Capability identity 77.3 · complete 89.7
Identity
Possession
Confidence 87%
Strongest capability
100.0
Deep Progression
Biggest gap
6.4
Tempo Control · score 6.7 / target 78
This squad is moderately suited to possession football because it combines Elite wide playmaking, Elite first-phase circulation, Elite deep progression. Main limitations: Below-minimum tempo control; Below-minimum rotational flexibility; Below-minimum recovery pace.
- · Primary Goalscoring depends heavily on one player (Rasmus Højlund).
Personnel (live)
Recomputed from current XI selection — role tiers are fixed inputs, not re-derived.
Progression hub
Scott McTominay
Elite Box Crasher
Primary creator
David Neres
Great Playmaking Winger
Primary threat
Rasmus Højlund
Great Poacher
Side bias (current XI)
+1.1%
RHS lean
Structural gaps
- Miguel Gutiérrez·LWBWeak fit for this slotHe’s in the XI here, but role form / touch map don’t back this position.
- Giovanni Di Lorenzo·RWBWeak fit for this slotHe’s in the XI here, but role form / touch map don’t back this position.
Style (season — fixed)
Serie A 25/26 · Season aggregates vs the rest of this competition. Click a shot zone to light it on the pitch.
Team identity
League-percentile style fingerprint for Napoli — shape of play, not overall strength. Outer edge = top of the competition on that axis.
Possession
Ball possession vs league
P89
3/20
Assisted creation
Share of shots after a teammate pass/cross
P84
4/20
Set pieces
Shots from corners / FKs / throw-in SP
P0
20/20
Transitions
Fast-break shot share
P11
18/20
Directness
Accurate long balls / passes
P0
20/20
Box threat
In-box shot share (six-yard + box)
P63
8/20
Press proxy
Defensive actions per opp possession
P74
6/20
Dashed ring = league median (P50)
Attack shape
Attack →
Shots from the six-yard + penalty box (close-range volume).
Mean xG / shot
Set-piece goals 20.7% of goals
0.105
10 of 20 · P47 · league med 0.105
How chances are created
Share of season shots by situation — not a quality score.
Assisted shot %
% of shots after a teammate pass/cross
53.3%
4 of 20 · P84 · league med 50
Set-piece shot %
Corners, FKs, throw-in SP, set pieces
23.7%
20 of 20 · P0 · league med 28.8
Fast-break shot %
Share of shots from transitions
5.0%
18 of 20 · P11 · league med 7.6
On the ball
Possession
Avg ball possession
58.9%
3 of 20 · P89 · league med 50.4
Long-ball rate
Accurate long balls / passes
3.4%
20 of 20 · P0 · league med 5.2
Final-third entries
Final-third entries / passes
9.8%
20 of 20 · P0 · league med 11.9
Side bias
Distance-weighted heatmap lean (+RHS / −LHS)
+9.3
2 of 20 · P95 · league med 1.7
Without the ball
Defensive actions / opp poss
Recoveries + tackles + ints ÷ opp possession
156.9
medium confidence — proxy, not PPDA
6 of 20 · P74 · league med 127.3
Clearances / match
Team clearances per game
16.4
1 of 20 · P100 · league med 25
Opp touches in box
Opponent penalty-area touches / match
15.4
2 of 20 · P95 · league med 22.7
Duel win %
Won/match · aerial 12.7 · ground 29.6
49.9%
10 of 20 · P53 · league med 49.9
Game State
Historical next-goal tendency · lead protection · chasing response — same engine as Match Preview
38 matches · 100% coverage
Level
HIGH53 entries · 1405 min in state
Goal timing
When goals arrive across the match clock · scored % · conceded % · net per window
38 of 38 matches
Scored %
19%
0-15
16%
16-30
19%
31-45
19%
46-60
10%
61-75
17%
76-90+
Conceded %
22%
0-15
8%
16-30
11%
31-45
22%
46-60
17%
61-75
19%
76-90+
Net / match (window only)
+0.08
0-15
+0.16
16-30
+0.18
31-45
+0.08
46-60
0.00
61-75
+0.08
76-90+
58 scored · 36 conceded · stoppage (90+) in 76–90+
Cross-layer insights (interpretive)
Anchored to season side bias — not updated by pitch swaps.
Team overload is elsewhere (+9.3) but Alisson Santos is an on-ball creator stationed on the weaker flank — may need local possession to impact.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Team season lean (+9.3) favors this flank and Eljif Elmas is an on-ball creator type — overload feeds the primary chance creator.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Similar teams
Style shape vs top-5 leagues, 25/26 — cosine similarity of the Team Identity radar percentiles (Possession, Assisted creation, Set pieces, Transitions, Directness, Box threat, Press proxy). Formation is context only and does not affect the score.
Manchester City
PL 25/26
Closest axes
Closest on Directness (P0 vs P0), Set pieces (P0 vs P5), Transitions (P11 vs P21).
Barcelona
La Liga
Closest axes
Closest on Directness (P0 vs P0), Transitions (P11 vs P11), Box threat (P63 vs P58).
Juventus
Serie A
Closest axes
Closest on Possession (P89 vs P84), Assisted creation (P84 vs P95), Set pieces (P0 vs P11).