FC Bayern München · Bundesliga · Champions League 25/26 — pick a competition below (same club, separate player pools)
Competition
Bundesliga 25/26
FC Bayern München
Default view is a per-slot first-choice selection in the season’s most-used formation. Swaps recompute personnel and Synergy — style metrics stay on season aggregates.
Interactive pitch
Hover a player for details. Use Side bias or Squad profiles to read the XI. Select bench → slot to swap.
Bench
Team Synergy
Team strength and Synergy (synergy-v3) for this XI. Both update on pitch swaps.
Team strength
89.5
Mean primary-role quality of this XI
Synergy
96.5
Capability identity 92.6 · complete 98.2
Identity
Possession
Confidence 87%
Strongest capability
100.0
Deep Progression
Biggest gap
31.1
Tempo Control · score 32.4 / target 78
This squad is exceptionally suited to possession football because it combines Elite wide playmaking, Elite first-phase circulation, Elite combination play. Main limitations: Below-minimum tempo control; Limited rotational flexibility; Average press resistance.
Personnel (live)
Recomputed from current XI selection — role tiers are fixed inputs, not re-derived.
Progression hub
Joshua Kimmich
Elite Box-to-Box Midfielder
Primary creator
Michael Olise
Elite Creator
Primary threat
Harry Kane
Elite Poacher
Updated by swap
Side bias (current XI)
+2.2%
RHS lean
No structural gaps in current XI.
Style (season — fixed)
Bundesliga 25/26 · Season aggregates vs the rest of this competition. Click a shot zone to light it on the pitch.
Team identity
League-percentile style fingerprint for FC Bayern München — shape of play, not overall strength. Outer edge = top of the competition on that axis.
Possession
Ball possession vs league
P100
1/19
Assisted creation
Share of shots after a teammate pass/cross
P100
1/19
Set pieces
Shots from corners / FKs / throw-in SP
P0
19/19
Transitions
Fast-break shot share
P39
12/19
Directness
Accurate long balls / passes
P6
18/19
Box threat
In-box shot share (six-yard + box)
P50
10/19
Press proxy
Defensive actions per opp possession
P100
1/19
Dashed ring = league median (P50)
Attack shape
Attack →
Shots from the six-yard + penalty box (close-range volume).
Mean xG / shot
Set-piece goals 18.0% of goals
0.154
1 of 19 · P100 · league med 0.114
How chances are created
Share of season shots by situation — not a quality score.
Assisted shot %
% of shots after a teammate pass/cross
60.6%
1 of 19 · P100 · league med 47.1
Set-piece shot %
Corners, FKs, throw-in SP, set pieces
18.0%
19 of 19 · P0 · league med 29.4
Fast-break shot %
Share of shots from transitions
7.6%
12 of 19 · P39 · league med 7.9
On the ball
Possession
Avg ball possession
67.4%
1 of 19 · P100 · league med 48
Long-ball rate
Accurate long balls / passes
4.0%
18 of 19 · P6 · league med 5.5
Final-third entries
Final-third entries / passes
10.9%
16 of 19 · P17 · league med 12.1
Side bias
Distance-weighted heatmap lean (+RHS / −LHS)
+5.6
3 of 19 · P89 · league med -1
Without the ball
Defensive actions / opp poss
Recoveries + tackles + ints ÷ opp possession
225.7
medium confidence — proxy, not PPDA
1 of 19 · P100 · league med 140
Clearances / match
Team clearances per game
17.1
1 of 19 · P100 · league med 28.3
Opp touches in box
Opponent penalty-area touches / match
18.9
1 of 19 · P100 · league med 24.2
Duel win %
Won/match · aerial 9.6 · ground 30.9
48.6%
16 of 19 · P17 · league med 49.9
Game State
Historical next-goal tendency · lead protection · chasing response — same engine as Match Preview
34 matches · 100% coverage
Level
HIGH55 entries · 1156 min in state
Goal timing
When goals arrive across the match clock · scored % · conceded % · net per window
34 of 34 matches
Scored %
7%
0-15
15%
16-30
19%
31-45
14%
46-60
16%
61-75
29%
76-90+
Conceded %
14%
0-15
22%
16-30
17%
31-45
8%
46-60
8%
61-75
31%
76-90+
Net / match (window only)
+0.12
0-15
+0.29
16-30
+0.50
31-45
+0.41
46-60
+0.50
61-75
+0.71
76-90+
122 scored · 36 conceded · stoppage (90+) in 76–90+
Cross-layer insights (interpretive)
Anchored to season side bias — not updated by pitch swaps.
Team side bias near central (+5.6); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Team side bias near central (+5.6); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Similar teams
Style shape vs top-5 leagues, 25/26 — cosine similarity of the Team Identity radar percentiles (Possession, Assisted creation, Set pieces, Transitions, Directness, Box threat, Press proxy). Formation is context only and does not affect the score.
Paris Saint-Germain
Ligue 1
Closest axes
Closest on Assisted creation (P100 vs P100), Possession (P100 vs P100), Press proxy (P100 vs P100).
Como
Serie A
Closest axes
Closest on Possession (P100 vs P100), Press proxy (P100 vs P100), Directness (P6 vs P5).
Barcelona
La Liga
Closest axes
Closest on Possession (P100 vs P100), Press proxy (P100 vs P100), Assisted creation (P100 vs P95).