Paris Saint-Germain · Ligue 1 · Champions League 25/26 — pick a competition below (same club, separate player pools)
Competition
Ligue 1 25/26
Paris Saint-Germain
Default view is a per-slot first-choice selection in the season’s most-used formation. Swaps recompute personnel and Synergy — style metrics stay on season aggregates.
Interactive pitch
Hover a player for details. Use Side bias or Squad profiles to read the XI. Select bench → slot to swap.
Bench
Team Synergy
Team strength and Synergy (synergy-v3) for this XI. Both update on pitch swaps.
Team strength
91.9
Mean primary-role quality of this XI
Synergy
94.5
Capability identity 92.5 · complete 98.9
Identity
Possession
Confidence 87%
Strongest capability
100.0
Deep Progression
Biggest gap
33.0
Tempo Control · score 34.4 / target 78
This squad is exceptionally suited to possession football because it combines Elite wide playmaking, Elite first-phase circulation, Elite counterpress. Main limitations: Below-minimum tempo control; Below-minimum rotational flexibility; Average combination play.
Personnel (live)
Recomputed from current XI selection — role tiers are fixed inputs, not re-derived.
Progression hub
Vitinha
Elite Deep-Lying Playmaker
Primary creator
Khvicha Kvaratskhelia
Elite Duelist Winger
Primary threat
Ousmane Dembélé
Great Playmaking Winger
Updated by swap
Side bias (current XI)
+0.3%
RHS lean
No structural gaps in current XI.
Style (season — fixed)
Ligue 1 25/26 · Season aggregates vs the rest of this competition. Click a shot zone to light it on the pitch.
Team identity
League-percentile style fingerprint for Paris Saint-Germain — shape of play, not overall strength. Outer edge = top of the competition on that axis.
Possession
Ball possession vs league
P100
1/21
Assisted creation
Share of shots after a teammate pass/cross
P100
1/21
Set pieces
Shots from corners / FKs / throw-in SP
P10
18/21
Transitions
Fast-break shot share
P30
14/21
Directness
Accurate long balls / passes
P20
17/21
Box threat
In-box shot share (six-yard + box)
P45
12/21
Press proxy
Defensive actions per opp possession
P100
1/21
Dashed ring = league median (P50)
Attack shape
Attack →
Shots from the six-yard + penalty box (close-range volume).
Mean xG / shot
Set-piece goals 17.6% of goals
0.116
9 of 21 · P60 · league med 0.112
How chances are created
Share of season shots by situation — not a quality score.
Assisted shot %
% of shots after a teammate pass/cross
60.6%
1 of 21 · P100 · league med 50.3
Set-piece shot %
Corners, FKs, throw-in SP, set pieces
21.8%
18 of 21 · P10 · league med 26.1
Fast-break shot %
Share of shots from transitions
6.0%
14 of 21 · P30 · league med 7.4
On the ball
Possession
Avg ball possession
68.8%
1 of 21 · P100 · league med 47
Long-ball rate
Accurate long balls / passes
3.8%
17 of 21 · P20 · league med 4.9
Final-third entries
Final-third entries / passes
10.0%
16 of 21 · P25 · league med 11.2
Side bias
Distance-weighted heatmap lean (+RHS / −LHS)
+1.9
10 of 21 · P55 · league med 1.2
Without the ball
Defensive actions / opp poss
Recoveries + tackles + ints ÷ opp possession
229.6
medium confidence — proxy, not PPDA
1 of 21 · P100 · league med 141.8
Clearances / match
Team clearances per game
13.7
3 of 21 · P90 · league med 22.5
Opp touches in box
Opponent penalty-area touches / match
16.2
3 of 21 · P90 · league med 22.1
Duel win %
Won/match · aerial 8.1 · ground 33.1
50.8%
4 of 21 · P85 · league med 50.1
Game State
Historical next-goal tendency · lead protection · chasing response — same engine as Match Preview
34 matches · 100% coverage
Level
HIGH46 entries · 1404 min in state
Goal timing
When goals arrive across the match clock · scored % · conceded % · net per window
34 of 34 matches
Scored %
15%
0-15
9%
16-30
20%
31-45
15%
46-60
16%
61-75
24%
76-90+
Conceded %
10%
0-15
21%
16-30
14%
31-45
17%
46-60
10%
61-75
28%
76-90+
Net / match (window only)
+0.24
0-15
+0.03
16-30
+0.32
31-45
+0.18
46-60
+0.27
61-75
+0.29
76-90+
74 scored · 29 conceded · stoppage (90+) in 76–90+
Cross-layer insights (interpretive)
Anchored to season side bias — not updated by pitch swaps.
Team side bias near central (+1.9); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Team side bias near central (+1.9); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Similar teams
Style shape vs top-5 leagues, 25/26 — cosine similarity of the Team Identity radar percentiles (Possession, Assisted creation, Set pieces, Transitions, Directness, Box threat, Press proxy). Formation is context only and does not affect the score.
FC Bayern München
Bundesliga
Closest axes
Closest on Assisted creation (P100 vs P100), Possession (P100 vs P100), Press proxy (P100 vs P100).
VfB Stuttgart
Bundesliga
Closest axes
Closest on Set pieces (P10 vs P6), Assisted creation (P100 vs P94), Directness (P20 vs P11).
Como
Serie A
Closest axes
Closest on Possession (P100 vs P100), Press proxy (P100 vs P100), Box threat (P45 vs P42).