Team Profiles
Real Madrid · La Liga · Champions League 25/26 — pick a competition below (same club, separate player pools)
Competition
LaLiga 25/26

Default view is a per-slot first-choice selection in the season’s most-used formation. Swaps recompute personnel and Synergy — style metrics stay on season aggregates.
Interactive pitch
Hover a player for details. Use Side bias or Squad profiles to read the XI. Select bench → slot to swap.
Bench
Team Synergy
Team strength and Synergy (synergy-v3) for this XI. Both update on pitch swaps.
Team strength
92.7
Mean primary-role quality of this XI
Synergy
91.2
Capability identity 89.4 · complete 97.5
Identity
Possession
Confidence 87%
Strongest capability
100.0
Deep Progression
Biggest gap
11.8
Tempo Control · score 12.3 / target 78
This squad is exceptionally suited to possession football because it combines Elite wide playmaking, Elite first-phase circulation, Elite combination play. Main limitations: Below-minimum tempo control; Below-minimum rotational flexibility; Limited ball retention.
Personnel (live)
Recomputed from current XI selection — role tiers are fixed inputs, not re-derived.
Progression hub
Arda Güler
Elite Playmaking Winger
Primary creator
Arda Güler
Elite Playmaking Winger
Updated by swap
Primary threat
Kylian Mbappé
Elite Shadow Striker
Side bias (current XI)
-7.2%
LHS lean
Structural gaps
Style (season — fixed)
LaLiga 25/26 · Season aggregates vs the rest of this competition. Click a shot zone to light it on the pitch.
Team identity
League-percentile style fingerprint for Real Madrid — shape of play, not overall strength. Outer edge = top of the competition on that axis.
Possession
Ball possession vs league
P95
2/20
Assisted creation
Share of shots after a teammate pass/cross
P74
6/20
Set pieces
Shots from corners / FKs / throw-in SP
P37
13/20
Transitions
Fast-break shot share
P47
11/20
Directness
Accurate long balls / passes
P11
18/20
Box threat
In-box shot share (six-yard + box)
P16
16/20
Press proxy
Defensive actions per opp possession
P89
3/20
Dashed ring = league median (P50)
Attack shape
Attack →
Shots from the six-yard + penalty box (close-range volume).
Mean xG / shot
Set-piece goals 18.2% of goals
0.117
5 of 20 · P79 · league med 0.109
How chances are created
Share of season shots by situation — not a quality score.
Assisted shot %
% of shots after a teammate pass/cross
54.1%
6 of 20 · P74 · league med 50
Set-piece shot %
Corners, FKs, throw-in SP, set pieces
26.5%
13 of 20 · P37 · league med 27.5
Fast-break shot %
Share of shots from transitions
6.8%
11 of 20 · P47 · league med 6.8
On the ball
Possession
Avg ball possession
59.4%
2 of 20 · P95 · league med 50.2
Long-ball rate
Accurate long balls / passes
4.6%
18 of 20 · P11 · league med 5.7
Final-third entries
Final-third entries / passes
11.8%
13 of 20 · P37 · league med 12.2
Side bias
Distance-weighted heatmap lean (+RHS / −LHS)
-5.6
19 of 20 · P5 · league med 3.4
Without the ball
Defensive actions / opp poss
Recoveries + tackles + ints ÷ opp possession
170.0
medium confidence — proxy, not PPDA
3 of 20 · P89 · league med 143.8
Clearances / match
Team clearances per game
16.9
1 of 20 · P100 · league med 24.9
Opp touches in box
Opponent penalty-area touches / match
18.2
3 of 20 · P89 · league med 23.1
Duel win %
Won/match · aerial 9.7 · ground 39.4
54.4%
1 of 20 · P100 · league med 49.9
Game State
Historical next-goal tendency · lead protection · chasing response — same engine as Match Preview
38 matches · 100% coverage
Level
HIGH55 entries · 1544 min in state
Goal timing
When goals arrive across the match clock · scored % · conceded % · net per window
38 of 38 matches
Scored %
9%
0-15
13%
16-30
21%
31-45
19%
46-60
13%
61-75
25%
76-90+
Conceded %
6%
0-15
11%
16-30
23%
31-45
17%
46-60
17%
61-75
26%
76-90+
Net / match (window only)
+0.13
0-15
+0.16
16-30
+0.21
31-45
+0.24
46-60
+0.11
61-75
+0.26
76-90+
77 scored · 35 conceded · stoppage (90+) in 76–90+
Cross-layer insights (interpretive)
Anchored to season side bias — not updated by pitch swaps.
Team side bias near central (-5.6); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Team side bias near central (-5.6); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Similar teams
Style shape vs top-5 leagues, 25/26 — cosine similarity of the Team Identity radar percentiles (Possession, Assisted creation, Set pieces, Transitions, Directness, Box threat, Press proxy). Formation is context only and does not affect the score.

Como
Serie A
Closest axes
Closest on Possession (P95 vs P100), Directness (P11 vs P5), Assisted creation (P74 vs P84).

Aston Villa
PL 25/26
Closest axes
Closest on Directness (P11 vs P11), Transitions (P47 vs P42), Assisted creation (P74 vs P68).

Bayer 04 Leverkusen
Bundesliga
Closest axes
Closest on Possession (P95 vs P94), Press proxy (P89 vs P94), Assisted creation (P74 vs P67).