Premier League 25/26
Fulham
Default view is a per-slot first-choice selection in the season’s most-used formation. Swaps recompute personnel and Synergy — style metrics stay on season aggregates.
Interactive pitch
Hover a player for details. Use Side bias or Squad profiles to read the XI. Select bench → slot to swap.
Bench
Team Synergy
Team strength and Synergy (synergy-v3) for this XI. Both update on pitch swaps.
Team strength
79.3
Mean primary-role quality of this XI
Synergy
79.5
Capability identity 77.5 · complete 85.6
Identity
Possession
Confidence 65%
Strongest capability
100.0
Deep Progression
Biggest gap
10.8
Tempo Control · score 11.3 / target 78
This squad is moderately suited to possession football because it combines Elite wide playmaking, Excellent rest defence, Elite width. Main limitations: Below-minimum tempo control; Below-minimum rotational flexibility; Below-minimum central playmaking.
- · Primary Goalscoring depends heavily on one player (Raúl Jiménez).
Personnel (live)
Recomputed from current XI selection — role tiers are fixed inputs, not re-derived.
Progression hub
Sander Berge
Average Deep-Lying Playmaker
Primary creator
Alex Iwobi
Great Wing Fielder
Primary threat
Raúl Jiménez
Elite Target Man
Side bias (current XI)
-7.9%
LHS lean
No structural gaps in current XI.
Style (season — fixed)
Premier League 25/26 · Season aggregates vs the rest of this competition. Click a shot zone to light it on the pitch.
Team identity
League-percentile style fingerprint for Fulham — shape of play, not overall strength. Outer edge = top of the competition on that axis.
Possession
Ball possession vs league
P58
9/20
Assisted creation
Share of shots after a teammate pass/cross
P79
5/20
Set pieces
Shots from corners / FKs / throw-in SP
P32
14/20
Transitions
Fast-break shot share
P16
17/20
Directness
Accurate long balls / passes
P11
18/20
Box threat
In-box shot share (six-yard + box)
P11
18/20
Press proxy
Defensive actions per opp possession
P53
10/20
Dashed ring = league median (P50)
Attack shape
Attack →
Shots from the six-yard + penalty box (close-range volume).
Mean xG / shot
Set-piece goals 25.5% of goals
—
15 of 20 · P0 · league med 0
How chances are created
Share of season shots by situation — not a quality score.
Assisted shot %
% of shots after a teammate pass/cross
52.4%
5 of 20 · P79 · league med 48.1
Set-piece shot %
Corners, FKs, throw-in SP, set pieces
27.5%
14 of 20 · P32 · league med 32.1
Fast-break shot %
Share of shots from transitions
—
17 of 20 · P16 · league med 7.1
On the ball
Possession
Avg ball possession
51.7%
9 of 20 · P58 · league med 50.3
Long-ball rate
Accurate long balls / passes
4.6%
18 of 20 · P11 · league med 8.8
Final-third entries
Final-third entries / passes
10.6%
15 of 20 · P0 · league med 0
Side bias
Distance-weighted heatmap lean (+RHS / −LHS)
-5.2
16 of 20 · P21 · league med -1.2
Without the ball
Defensive actions / opp poss
Recoveries + tackles + ints ÷ opp possession
146.5
medium confidence — proxy, not PPDA
10 of 20 · P53 · league med 146.5
Clearances / match
Team clearances per game
26.4
6 of 20 · P100 · league med 0
Opp touches in box
Opponent penalty-area touches / match
25.1
6 of 20 · P100 · league med 0
Duel win %
Won/match · aerial 14.3 · ground 32.2
51.3%
15 of 20 · P0 · league med 0
Game State
Historical next-goal tendency · lead protection · chasing response — same engine as Match Preview
38 matches · 100% coverage
Level
HIGH54 entries · 1869 min in state
Goal timing
When goals arrive across the match clock · scored % · conceded % · net per window
38 of 38 matches
Scored %
13%
0-15
6%
16-30
19%
31-45
13%
46-60
19%
61-75
30%
76-90+
Conceded %
2%
0-15
20%
16-30
22%
31-45
25%
46-60
8%
61-75
24%
76-90+
Net / match (window only)
+0.13
0-15
-0.18
16-30
-0.05
31-45
-0.18
46-60
+0.13
61-75
+0.05
76-90+
47 scored · 51 conceded · stoppage (90+) in 76–90+
Cross-layer insights (interpretive)
Anchored to season side bias — not updated by pitch swaps.
Team side bias near central (-5.2); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Team side bias near central (-5.2); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Similar teams
Style shape vs top-5 leagues, 25/26 — cosine similarity of the Team Identity radar percentiles (Possession, Assisted creation, Set pieces, Transitions, Directness, Box threat, Press proxy). Formation is context only and does not affect the score.
Lazio
Serie A
Closest axes
Closest on Assisted creation (P79 vs P79), Possession (P58 vs P53), Transitions (P16 vs P21).
Stade Rennais
Ligue 1
Closest axes
Closest on Set pieces (P32 vs P30), Assisted creation (P79 vs P75), Transitions (P16 vs P20).
Brighton & Hove Albion
PL 25/26
Closest axes
Closest on Assisted creation (P79 vs P84), Set pieces (P32 vs P21), Transitions (P16 vs P5).