LaLiga 25/26
Elche
Default view is a per-slot first-choice selection in the season’s most-used formation. Swaps recompute personnel and Synergy — style metrics stay on season aggregates.
Interactive pitch
Hover a player for details. Use Side bias or Squad profiles to read the XI. Select bench → slot to swap.
Bench
Team Synergy
Team strength and Synergy (synergy-v3) for this XI. Both update on pitch swaps.
Team strength
84.5
Mean primary-role quality of this XI
Synergy
56.0
Capability identity 64.6 · complete 77.0
Identity
Possession
Confidence 87%
Strongest capability
100.0
Defensive Coverage
Biggest gap
3.9
Tempo Control · score 4.1 / target 78
This squad is only partially suited to possession football because it combines Elite width, Elite counterpress, Strong rest defence. Main limitations: Below-minimum tempo control; Below-minimum rotational flexibility; Below-minimum ball retention.
Personnel (live)
Recomputed from current XI selection — role tiers are fixed inputs, not re-derived.
Progression hub
Gonzalo Villar
Good Carrier
Primary creator
Grady Diangana
Good Box Crasher
Primary threat
Álvaro Rodriguez
Elite Target Man
Side bias (current XI)
+3.2%
RHS lean
Structural gaps
- Germán Valera·LWBWeak fit for this slotHe’s in the XI here, but role form / touch map don’t back this position.
- Tete Morente·RWBWeak fit for this slotHe’s in the XI here, but role form / touch map don’t back this position.
Style (season — fixed)
LaLiga 25/26 · Season aggregates vs the rest of this competition. Click a shot zone to light it on the pitch.
Team identity
League-percentile style fingerprint for Elche — shape of play, not overall strength. Outer edge = top of the competition on that axis.
Possession
Ball possession vs league
P89
3/20
Assisted creation
Share of shots after a teammate pass/cross
P89
3/20
Set pieces
Shots from corners / FKs / throw-in SP
P21
16/20
Transitions
Fast-break shot share
P21
16/20
Directness
Accurate long balls / passes
P26
15/20
Box threat
In-box shot share (six-yard + box)
P84
4/20
Press proxy
Defensive actions per opp possession
P95
2/20
Dashed ring = league median (P50)
Attack shape
Attack →
Shots from the six-yard + penalty box (close-range volume).
Mean xG / shot
Set-piece goals 14.3% of goals
0.105
12 of 20 · P42 · league med 0.109
How chances are created
Share of season shots by situation — not a quality score.
Assisted shot %
% of shots after a teammate pass/cross
56.6%
3 of 20 · P89 · league med 50
Set-piece shot %
Corners, FKs, throw-in SP, set pieces
22.8%
16 of 20 · P21 · league med 27.5
Fast-break shot %
Share of shots from transitions
5.8%
16 of 20 · P21 · league med 6.8
On the ball
Possession
Avg ball possession
56.1%
3 of 20 · P89 · league med 50.2
Long-ball rate
Accurate long balls / passes
4.9%
15 of 20 · P26 · league med 5.7
Final-third entries
Final-third entries / passes
11.8%
12 of 20 · P37 · league med 12.2
Side bias
Distance-weighted heatmap lean (+RHS / −LHS)
-1.3
17 of 20 · P16 · league med 3.4
Without the ball
Defensive actions / opp poss
Recoveries + tackles + ints ÷ opp possession
172.3
medium confidence — proxy, not PPDA
2 of 20 · P95 · league med 143.8
Clearances / match
Team clearances per game
22.0
5 of 20 · P79 · league med 24.9
Opp touches in box
Opponent penalty-area touches / match
23.1
11 of 20 · P47 · league med 23.1
Duel win %
Won/match · aerial 12.5 · ground 37.9
50.2%
7 of 20 · P68 · league med 49.9
Game State
Historical next-goal tendency · lead protection · chasing response — same engine as Match Preview
38 matches · 100% coverage
Level
HIGH61 entries · 1786 min in state
Goal timing
When goals arrive across the match clock · scored % · conceded % · net per window
38 of 38 matches
Scored %
12%
0-15
14%
16-30
14%
31-45
16%
46-60
22%
61-75
20%
76-90+
Conceded %
21%
0-15
9%
16-30
12%
31-45
12%
46-60
14%
61-75
32%
76-90+
Net / match (window only)
-0.16
0-15
+0.05
16-30
0.00
31-45
+0.03
46-60
+0.08
61-75
-0.21
76-90+
49 scored · 57 conceded · stoppage (90+) in 76–90+
Cross-layer insights (interpretive)
Anchored to season side bias — not updated by pitch swaps.
Team side bias near central (-1.3); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Team side bias near central (-1.3); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Similar teams
Style shape vs top-5 leagues, 25/26 — cosine similarity of the Team Identity radar percentiles (Possession, Assisted creation, Set pieces, Transitions, Directness, Box threat, Press proxy). Formation is context only and does not affect the score.
Juventus
Serie A
Closest axes
Closest on Box threat (P84 vs P79), Possession (P89 vs P84), Assisted creation (P89 vs P95).
RB Leipzig
Bundesliga
Closest axes
Closest on Directness (P26 vs P22), Assisted creation (P89 vs P83), Box threat (P84 vs P72).
Manchester City
PL 25/26
Closest axes
Closest on Transitions (P21 vs P21), Box threat (P84 vs P89), Press proxy (P95 vs P100).