Bundesliga 25/26
1. FSV Mainz 05
Default view is a per-slot first-choice selection in the season’s most-used formation. Swaps recompute personnel and Synergy — style metrics stay on season aggregates.
Interactive pitch
Hover a player for details. Use Side bias or Squad profiles to read the XI. Select bench → slot to swap.
Bench
Team Synergy
Team strength and Synergy (synergy-v3) for this XI. Both update on pitch swaps.
Team strength
83.1
Mean primary-role quality of this XI
Synergy
77.7
Capability identity 97.0 · complete 95.4
Identity
Crossing / Wide Supply
Confidence 70%
Strongest capability
100.0
Central Playmaking
Biggest gap
80.9
Crossing · score 88.8 / target 88
This squad is exceptionally suited to crossing / wide supply football because it combines Elite primary goalscoring, Elite secondary box runs, Elite wide playmaking. Main limitations: no major capability gaps against this identity.
Personnel (live)
Recomputed from current XI selection — role tiers are fixed inputs, not re-derived.
Progression hub
Nadiem Amiri
Elite Playmaking Winger
Primary creator
Nadiem Amiri
Elite Playmaking Winger
Updated by swap
Primary threat
Jonathan Burkardt
Elite Poacher
Side bias (current XI)
-1.5%
LHS lean
Structural gaps
- Phillipp Mwene·LWBWeak fit for this slotHe’s in the XI here, but role form / touch map don’t back this position.
- Silvan Widmer·RWBWeak fit for this slotHe’s in the XI here, but role form / touch map don’t back this position.
Style (season — fixed)
Bundesliga 25/26 · Season aggregates vs the rest of this competition. Click a shot zone to light it on the pitch.
Team identity
League-percentile style fingerprint for 1. FSV Mainz 05 — shape of play, not overall strength. Outer edge = top of the competition on that axis.
Possession
Ball possession vs league
P11
17/19
Assisted creation
Share of shots after a teammate pass/cross
P6
18/19
Set pieces
Shots from corners / FKs / throw-in SP
P83
4/19
Transitions
Fast-break shot share
P17
16/19
Directness
Accurate long balls / passes
P89
3/19
Box threat
In-box shot share (six-yard + box)
P100
1/19
Press proxy
Defensive actions per opp possession
P39
12/19
Dashed ring = league median (P50)
Attack shape
Attack →
Shots from the six-yard + penalty box (close-range volume).
Mean xG / shot
Set-piece goals 22.7% of goals
0.134
3 of 19 · P89 · league med 0.114
How chances are created
Share of season shots by situation — not a quality score.
Assisted shot %
% of shots after a teammate pass/cross
40.7%
18 of 19 · P6 · league med 47.1
Set-piece shot %
Corners, FKs, throw-in SP, set pieces
37.8%
4 of 19 · P83 · league med 29.4
Fast-break shot %
Share of shots from transitions
6.6%
16 of 19 · P17 · league med 7.9
On the ball
Possession
Avg ball possession
43.9%
17 of 19 · P11 · league med 48
Long-ball rate
Accurate long balls / passes
6.7%
3 of 19 · P89 · league med 5.5
Final-third entries
Final-third entries / passes
15.9%
2 of 19 · P94 · league med 12.1
Side bias
Distance-weighted heatmap lean (+RHS / −LHS)
-4.3
14 of 19 · P28 · league med -1
Without the ball
Defensive actions / opp poss
Recoveries + tackles + ints ÷ opp possession
131.1
medium confidence — proxy, not PPDA
12 of 19 · P39 · league med 140
Clearances / match
Team clearances per game
30.6
13 of 19 · P33 · league med 28.3
Opp touches in box
Opponent penalty-area touches / match
26.4
14 of 19 · P28 · league med 24.2
Duel win %
Won/match · aerial 20.5 · ground 30.3
49.1%
13 of 19 · P33 · league med 49.9
Game State
Historical next-goal tendency · lead protection · chasing response — same engine as Match Preview
34 matches · 100% coverage
Level
HIGH53 entries · 1371 min in state
Goal timing
When goals arrive across the match clock · scored % · conceded % · net per window
34 of 34 matches
Scored %
18%
0-15
11%
16-30
23%
31-45
11%
46-60
16%
61-75
20%
76-90+
Conceded %
19%
0-15
11%
16-30
13%
31-45
13%
46-60
6%
61-75
38%
76-90+
Net / match (window only)
-0.06
0-15
-0.03
16-30
+0.09
31-45
-0.06
46-60
+0.12
61-75
-0.32
76-90+
44 scored · 53 conceded · stoppage (90+) in 76–90+
Cross-layer insights (interpretive)
Anchored to season side bias — not updated by pitch swaps.
Team side bias near central (-4.3); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Team side bias near central (-4.3); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Similar teams
Style shape vs top-5 leagues, 25/26 — cosine similarity of the Team Identity radar percentiles (Possession, Assisted creation, Set pieces, Transitions, Directness, Box threat, Press proxy). Formation is context only and does not affect the score.
Osasuna
La Liga
Closest axes
Closest on Set pieces (P83 vs P84), Box threat (P100 vs P95), Assisted creation (P6 vs P16).
Leeds United
PL 25/26
Closest axes
Closest on Assisted creation (P6 vs P5), Box threat (P100 vs P95), Transitions (P17 vs P26).
1. FC Union Berlin
Bundesliga
Closest axes
Closest on Assisted creation (P6 vs P0), Box threat (P100 vs P94), Directness (P89 vs P100).